Re: Block-level CRC checks

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jonah H. Harris
Тема Re: Block-level CRC checks
Дата
Msg-id 36e682920810300822m5ebb068dqd4338f0c23e5c5eb@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Block-level CRC checks  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Block-level CRC checks  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 11:14 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> "Jonah H. Harris" <jonah.harris@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@sun.com> wrote:
>>> Please, DO NOT MOVE position of page version in PageHeader structure! And
>>> PG_PAGE_LAYOUT_VERSION should be bump to 5.
>
>> Umm, any in-place upgrade should be capable of handling changes to the
>> page header.
>
> Well, yeah, but it has to be able to tell which version it's dealing
> with.  I quite agree with Zdenek that keeping the version indicator
> in a fixed location is appropriate.

Most of the other databases I've worked, which don't have different
types of pages, put the page version as the first element of the page.That would let us put the crc right after it.
Thoughts?

-- 
Jonah H. Harris, Senior DBA
myYearbook.com


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Block-level CRC checks
Следующее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Block-level CRC checks