Re: Block-level CRC checks

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alvaro Herrera
Тема Re: Block-level CRC checks
Дата
Msg-id 20081030152257.GD3857@alvh.no-ip.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Block-level CRC checks  (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>)
Ответы Re: Block-level CRC checks  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Gregory Stark wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> 
> > Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >
> >> The "other hint bits" are:
> >> 
> >> - LP_DEAD as used by the various callers of ItemIdMarkDead.
> >> - PD_PAGE_FULL
> >> - BTPageOpaque->btpo_flags and btpo_cycleid
> >> 
> >> All of them are changed with only SetBufferCommitInfoNeedsSave being
> >> called afterwards.
> >
> > I think we could get away with WAL-logging LP_DEAD via ItemIdMarkDead
> > similar to what is done to SetHintBits in the posted patch, and cope
> > with the rest by marking the page with the invalid checksum; they are
> > not so frequent anyway so the reliability loss is low.
> 
> If PD_PAGE_FULL is set and that causes the crc to be set to the invalid sum
> will we ever get another chance to set it?

I should have qualified that a bit more.  It's not setting PD_FULL
that's not logged, but clearing it (heap_prune_page, line 282).  It's
set in heap_update.

Hmm, oh I see another problem here -- the bit is not restored when
replayed heap_update's WAL record.  I'm now wondering what other bits
are set without much care about correctly restoring them during replay.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Jonah H. Harris"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Block-level CRC checks
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Block-level CRC checks