Re: [HACKERS] JDBC lo crashes etc (fwd)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Thomas Reinke
Тема Re: [HACKERS] JDBC lo crashes etc (fwd)
Дата
Msg-id 36C7913C.26296F5@e-softinc.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на JDBC lo crashes etc (fwd)  (Peter T Mount <peter@retep.org.uk>)
Список pgsql-hackers
I'd also like to know - this is one of the errors I have seen using
PostGres when using multiple clients, and why we've had to implement
a lock manager outside of PostGres to limit access to a single client
at a time.

Thomas

Peter T Mount wrote:
> 
> Does anyone know what's going on here?
> 
> --
>        Peter T Mount peter@retep.org.uk
>       Main Homepage: http://www.retep.org.uk
> PostgreSQL JDBC Faq: http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres
>  Java PDF Generator: http://www.retep.org.uk/pdf
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Fri, 12 Feb 1999 18:59:00 -0800
> From: Jason Venner <jason@idiom.com>
> To: Peter T Mount <peter@retep.org.uk>
> Subject: JDBC lo crashes etc
> 
> I recompiled my 6.3.2 with cassert turned on, and using the 6.4.2 jdbc driver, I get the following
> after inserting a bunch of images.
> 
> postmaster.log: NOTICE:  SIMarkEntryData: cache state reset
> postmaster.log: Failed Assertion("!(RelationNameCache->hctl->nkeys == 10):", File: "relcache.c", Line: 1523)
> postmaster.log: !(RelationNameCache->hctl->nkeys == 10) (0) [Illegal seek]

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------
Thomas Reinke                            Tel: (416) 460-7021
Director of Technology                   Fax: (416) 598-2319
E-Soft Inc.                         http://www.e-softinc.com


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer is fixed, and faster
Следующее
От: Ryan Bradetich
Дата:
Сообщение: Is the int8_ops being implimented?