Re: 2021-09 Commitfest

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: 2021-09 Commitfest
Дата
Msg-id 3691402.1633188721@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: 2021-09 Commitfest  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Ответы Re: 2021-09 Commitfest  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Re: 2021-09 Commitfest  (Jaime Casanova <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
> On 2021-Oct-02, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Yeah.  I have been thinking of looking through the oldest CF entries
>> and proposing that we just reject any that look permanently stalled.

> I was just going to say the same thing yesterday, and reference [1]
> when I did it once in 2019.  I think it was a useful cleanup exercise.
> [1] https://postgr.es/m/20190930182818.GA25331@alvherre.pgsql

Right.  Michael and Jaime have been doing some of that too in the last
few days, but obviously a CFM should only do that unilaterally in very
clear-cut cases of patch abandonment.  I was intending to go after some
where maybe a bit of community consensus is needed for rejection.

            regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: 2021-09 Commitfest
Следующее
От: Justin Pryzby
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: should frontend tools use syncfs() ?