On Sat, Oct 02, 2021 at 11:32:01AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
> > On 2021-Oct-02, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Yeah. I have been thinking of looking through the oldest CF entries
> >> and proposing that we just reject any that look permanently stalled.
>
> > I was just going to say the same thing yesterday, and reference [1]
> > when I did it once in 2019. I think it was a useful cleanup exercise.
> > [1] https://postgr.es/m/20190930182818.GA25331@alvherre.pgsql
>
> Right. Michael and Jaime have been doing some of that too in the last
> few days, but obviously a CFM should only do that unilaterally in very
> clear-cut cases of patch abandonment. I was intending to go after some
> where maybe a bit of community consensus is needed for rejection.
>
I have done so with 2 or 3 patches that has been stalled more than one
month and after asking in the thread if I receive no answer for 2 or 3
weeks.
--
Jaime Casanova
Director de Servicios Profesionales
SystemGuards - Consultores de PostgreSQL