Re: 2021-09 Commitfest
От | Jaime Casanova |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 2021-09 Commitfest |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20211003162021.GA7908@ahch-to обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 2021-09 Commitfest (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: 2021-09 Commitfest
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Oct 02, 2021 at 11:32:01AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes: > > On 2021-Oct-02, Tom Lane wrote: > >> Yeah. I have been thinking of looking through the oldest CF entries > >> and proposing that we just reject any that look permanently stalled. > > > I was just going to say the same thing yesterday, and reference [1] > > when I did it once in 2019. I think it was a useful cleanup exercise. > > [1] https://postgr.es/m/20190930182818.GA25331@alvherre.pgsql > > Right. Michael and Jaime have been doing some of that too in the last > few days, but obviously a CFM should only do that unilaterally in very > clear-cut cases of patch abandonment. I was intending to go after some > where maybe a bit of community consensus is needed for rejection. > I have done so with 2 or 3 patches that has been stalled more than one month and after asking in the thread if I receive no answer for 2 or 3 weeks. -- Jaime Casanova Director de Servicios Profesionales SystemGuards - Consultores de PostgreSQL
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: