Re: Reasons for postgres processes beeing killed by SIGNAL 9?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alan Hodgson
Тема Re: Reasons for postgres processes beeing killed by SIGNAL 9?
Дата
Msg-id 3605585.hDLB9QBq9s@skynet.simkin.ca
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Reasons for postgres processes beeing killed by SIGNAL 9?  (Clemens Eisserer <linuxhippy@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general
On Saturday, May 19, 2012 04:42:16 PM Clemens Eisserer wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> We are still constantly getting postgresql processes killed by signal
> 9 from time to time, without any idea why or how.
> Syslog seems completly clean.
>
> In case a postgresql process would exceed some restricted resources
> like file descriptors, would the kernel choose to terminate it using
> SIGKILL? Are there any other common examples / occurences where
> processes are terminated this way automatically?

Check dmesg or the kernel log. I'd guess it's the OOM-killer. Assuming this is
on Linux, that is.


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: David Kerr
Дата:
Сообщение: haproxy / pgpool / rhcs
Следующее
От: Lonni J Friedman
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: significant performance hit whenever autovacuum runs after upgrading from 9.0 -> 9.1