Re: [HACKERS] Rules for 6.4 finished

>     I'm  running into some naming problems while doing so. Having
>     pg_table, pg_view etc. as views lets a users assume  pg_index
>     would  be one too where to get some information. But pg_index
>     already exists.
>
>     Should I name all of them pgv_... ?
>
>     Other databases have many views starting with DBA or  SYS  on
>     the  other  hand.  For now I'll start naming them pgv_..., we
>     could rename them before applying the patch.

I recall that there are some places in the code (maybe only in the
client-side drivers?) which check explicitly for a "pg_%" pattern to
decide if a table or resource is a system table.

How about "pg_index_v", for example?

                     - Tom