Re: [HACKERS] next XID is in shmem now...

Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Backends fetch 1024 XIDs now and place them in shmem.
> > There is space in VariableCache struct for OIDs as well
> > but I didn't change GetNewObjectId() due to the
> > CheckMaxObjectId() stuff... Bruce ?
>
> What can I do to help?  Is the problem that a backend can set the next
> oid by specifiying an oid greater than the current one?

No problem - I just havn't time to think about this, sorry.

>
> >
> > All other LLL stuff will be #ifdef-ed...
>
> As far as I am concerned, you don't need use #ifdef.

I'm not sure how much ready/robust this will be in 6.4.
This is long-term project...

Vadim