Re: [HACKERS] next XID is in shmem now...

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: [HACKERS] next XID is in shmem now...
Дата
Msg-id 199807211427.KAA28618@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на next XID is in shmem now...  (Vadim Mikheev <vadim@krs.ru>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> Backends fetch 1024 XIDs now and place them in shmem.
> There is space in VariableCache struct for OIDs as well
> but I didn't change GetNewObjectId() due to the
> CheckMaxObjectId() stuff... Bruce ?

What can I do to help?  Is the problem that a backend can set the next
oid by specifiying an oid greater than the current one?

>
> All other LLL stuff will be #ifdef-ed...

As far as I am concerned, you don't need use #ifdef.

--
Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Matthew N. Dodd"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] cidr
Следующее
От: Nick Bastin
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] cidr