Re: effective_cache_size vs units

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: effective_cache_size vs units
Дата
Msg-id 3591.1167751178@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: effective_cache_size vs units  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Am Donnerstag, 28. Dezember 2006 13:25 schrieb Jim C. Nasby:
>> Yes, and I can't think of a single reason why we'd let people specify
>> anything in millibytes, or kilobits.

> How about a configuration option related to connection throughput, which is 
> typically measured in bits?

But at least as often in bytes.  What's more, if the system really were
to accept both units, you could reasonably expect that people would get
it wrong at least half the time ...
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCHES] xlog directory at initdb time
Следующее
От: Chris Browne
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Deadline-Based Vacuum Delay