Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
>> Aside from the lwlock business, Karel seems to be seeing some problem
>> in to_timestamp/to_date.
> I thought Karel sent in a to_date patch yesterday that you applied. Was
> there another issue?
Yes. He reported something that looked a lot like a DST boundary
problem, except it wasn't on a DST boundary date. Thomas thought it
might be a consequence of the timestamp-vs-timestamptz change from
7.1 to 7.2. See http://fts.postgresql.org/db/mw/msg.html?mid=1345390
(BTW, is anyone else noticing that fts.postgresql.org is missing an
awful lot of traffic? For example, I can't get it to show Thomas'
comment on the above-mentioned thread; and that is *VERY* far from
being its only omission lately.)
regards, tom lane