On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> >> Aside from the lwlock business, Karel seems to be seeing some problem
> >> in to_timestamp/to_date.
>
> > I thought Karel sent in a to_date patch yesterday that you applied. Was
> > there another issue?
>
> Yes. He reported something that looked a lot like a DST boundary
> problem, except it wasn't on a DST boundary date. Thomas thought it
> might be a consequence of the timestamp-vs-timestamptz change from
> 7.1 to 7.2. See http://fts.postgresql.org/db/mw/msg.html?mid=1345390
>
> (BTW, is anyone else noticing that fts.postgresql.org is missing an
> awful lot of traffic? For example, I can't get it to show Thomas'
> comment on the above-mentioned thread; and that is *VERY* far from
> being its only omission lately.)
We just moved it from the old server (that I have to shut down) to the new
one at Rackspace ... the one thing I have to do over the next short period
of time is to spring for a memory upgrade on that machine though, as
512Meg just doesn't cut it :(