Re: [QUESTIONS] Re: [HACKERS] text should be a blob field
| От | Vadim B. Mikheev |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [QUESTIONS] Re: [HACKERS] text should be a blob field |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 34FE6B78.5DE8B8AC@sable.krasnoyarsk.su обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] text should be a blob field (Peter T Mount <psqlhack@maidast.demon.co.uk>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [QUESTIONS] Re: [HACKERS] text should be a blob field
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter T Mount wrote: > > On Tue, 3 Mar 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > make text a blob datatype (maybe storing <= 8k row with tuple, >=8k in blob > > > tablespace) > > > > There was some talk about this about a month ago. > > Although we now have blob support in the JDBC driver, there is one > outstanding issue with them, that I was waiting for 6.3 to be released > before starting on it (and almost certainly starting a discussion here > about it). > > Allowing text to use blobs for values larger than the current block size > would hit the same problem. When I told about multi-representation feature I ment that applications will not be affected by how text field is stored - in tuple or somewhere else. Is this Ok for you ? Vadim
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: