Re: [HACKERS] Rule plan size for views?
| От | Thomas G. Lockhart |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Rule plan size for views? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 34FABAD1.5BC5D73D@alumni.caltech.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Rule plan size for views? (jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Rule plan size for views?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > Sounds like the plan internally grew (possible w/subselect stuff?!?) and
> > has gone over that 8k limit.
>
> I think it must be due to the cleanups in the node-print and
> read funcs. They now output/read ALL fields in the nodes.
Oh, I didn't realize that the print functions were actually used for something
other than printing and debugging. I had started to add a few new nodes when I
was trying to debug the "primary key" code.
Should we go through and bracket some of those with #ifdef QUERYDEBUG or
something like that? Where are they actually used? Should we try to keep these
at a minimum for production compiles of the system??
- Tom
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: