Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix inadequacies in recently added wait events

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> writes:
>>> As for whether hypothetical check scripts would ever be run, I was
>>> thinking we should stick them under some make target that developers
>>> run all the time anyway -- perhaps "check".  Shouldn't we catch simple
>>> mechanically detectable problems as early in the pipeline as possible?

>> Adding overhead to every developer's every test cycle doesn't sound
>> like a win.

> If it takes 100ms, nobody's gonna notice.

I doubt running a perl script that analyzes the entire backend source
code is gonna take 100ms.
        regards, tom lane