Re: [HACKERS] PoC plpgsql - possibility to force custom or generic plan

Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com> writes:
> We already have 'SET LOCAL', which manages scope to the current
> transaction.  How about SET BLOCK which would set until you've left
> the current statement block?

(1) I do not think this approach will play terribly well in any of the
PLs; their notions of statement blocks all differ from whatever we might
think that is at the interactive-SQL-command level.

(2) AIUI the feature request is specifically for a single-statement
variable change, not any larger scope than that.
        regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers