Re: pg_archivecleanup bug
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pg_archivecleanup bug |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 31842.1395150968@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: pg_archivecleanup bug (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pg_archivecleanup bug
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Very good point. I have modified the patch to add this block in all
> cases where it was missing. I started to wonder about the comment and
> if the Mingw fix was released. Based on some research, I see this as
> fixed in mingw-runtime-3.2, released 2003-10-10. That's pretty old.
Yeah. I would vote for removing that code in all branches. There is no
reason to suppose somebody is going to install 8.4.22 on a machine that
they haven't updated mingw on since 2003. Or, if you prefer, just remove
it in HEAD --- but going around and *adding* more copies seems like
make-work. The fact that we've not heard complaints about the omissions
is good evidence that nobody's using the buggy mingw versions anymore.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: