Re: TRACE_SORT defined by default

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: TRACE_SORT defined by default
Дата
Msg-id 31375.1556225793@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: TRACE_SORT defined by default  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: TRACE_SORT defined by default  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 2019-Apr-25, Jeff Janes wrote:
>> I've had people use it to get some insight into the operation and memory
>> usage of Aggregate nodes, since those nodes offer nothing useful via
>> EXPLAIN ANALYZE.  It would be a shame to lose that ability on
>> package-installed PostgreSQL unless we fix Aggregate node reporting first.

> But the proposal is not to remove the _code_.  The proposal is just to
> remove that "#ifdef" lines that would make it conditionally compilable,
> *if* the symbol that they test weren't always enabled.  In other words,
> turn it from "always compiled, but you can turn it off although nobody
> does" into "always compiled".

Well, I was suggesting that we ought to consider the alternative of
making it *not* always compiled, and Jeff was pushing back on that.

            regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: TRACE_SORT defined by default
Следующее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: TRACE_SORT defined by default