Re: Lack of urgency in 8.3 reviewing

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Cui Shijun
Тема Re: Lack of urgency in 8.3 reviewing
Дата
Msg-id 306760850705170736r11b70550ged4d6db302b54671@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Lack of urgency in 8.3 reviewing  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Ответы Re: Lack of urgency in 8.3 reviewing  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
I see...
I checked part of HOT patches(patch1), and found that it involves too
many things I am not currently familar with. Maybe I should change an
item to work. :-(
Since I only studied part of source codes about transaction
processing(lmgr/MVCC/xact  but without xlog.c),  I want to study
"Group Commit" patch and try to review it, any suggestions?

2007/5/17, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>:
> Pavan Deolasee wrote:
> > On 5/17/07, Cui Shijun <rancpine@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I want to help the reviewing work of "ctid chain following enhancement ".
> > > I've been studying the souce code which related with that part recently.
> > > :-)
> >
> >
> >
> > Tom had objected to this patch on the grounds that it adds complexity
> > without any significant gains. Though I don't completely agree with the
> > first part, the second part is indeed debatable since the code is touched
> > only
> > for infrequently.
>
> Right.  The reason the patch was kept in the queue is that there was
> discussion that HOT will exercise that part of the code a lot more than
> it does currently.
>
> --
>  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>          http://momjian.us
>  EnterpriseDB                               http://www.enterprisedb.com
>
>  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
>


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Greg Smith
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Not ready for 8.3
Следующее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Not ready for 8.3