Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables)
Дата
Msg-id 30347.1545844056@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writablevariables)  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> writes:
> On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 11:22:39AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> In my hands, the only part of the low-level parsing code that
>> commonly shows up as interesting in profiles is the Bison engine.

> Should we be considering others?

We've looked around before, IIRC, and not really seen any arguably
better tools.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Mitar
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Feature: triggers on materialized views
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables)