Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writablevariables)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David Fetter
Тема Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writablevariables)
Дата
Msg-id 20181226163840.GE416@fetter.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 11:22:39AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> In my hands, the only part of the low-level parsing code that
> commonly shows up as interesting in profiles is the Bison engine.

Should we be considering others? As I understand it, steps have been
made in this field since yacc was originally designed. Is LALR
actually suitable for languages like SQL, or is it just there for
historical reasons?

Best,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables)
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Shared Memory: How to use SYSV rather than MMAP ?