Re: prevent immature WAL streaming

Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> On 9/29/21 4:33 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> which looks like a pretty straightforward bogus-connection-configuration
>> problem, except why wouldn't other BF members show it?

> This:
> ...
> doesn't have "allows_streaming => 1".

Oh, and that only breaks things on Windows, cf set_replication_conf.

... although I wonder why the fact that sub init otherwise sets
wal_level = minimal doesn't cause a problem for this test.
Maybe the test script is cowboy-ishly overriding that?

            regards, tom lane