RE: Big 7.1 open items

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Don Baccus
Тема RE: Big 7.1 open items
Дата
Msg-id 3.0.1.32.20000620221248.0150f610@mail.pacifier.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на RE: Big 7.1 open items  ("Philip J. Warner" <pjw@rhyme.com.au>)
Ответы RE: Big 7.1 open items  ("Philip J. Warner" <pjw@rhyme.com.au>)
Список pgsql-hackers
At 11:22 AM 6/21/00 +1000, Philip J. Warner wrote:

>It may be worth considering leaving the CREATE TABLE statement alone.
>Dec/RDB uses a new statement entirely to define where a table goes...

It's worth considering, but on the other hand Oracle users greatly
outnumber Compaq/RDB users these days...

If there's no SQL92 guidance for implementing a feature, I'm pretty much in
favor of tracking Oracle, whose SQL dialect is rapidly becoming a
de-facto standard. 

I'm not saying I like the fact, Oracle's a pain in the ass.  But when
adopting existing syntax, might as well adopt that of the crushing
borg.



- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza@pacifier.com> Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest Rare Bird Alert
Serviceand other goodies at http://donb.photo.net.
 


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Don Baccus
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Big 7.1 open items
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Big 7.1 open items