On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Uh, we get a lot of really mangled SQL and explain plans -- I don't see
> anything wrong with these. If the question was unclear it sounds like it's
> just because it's a fairly subtle problem and was hard to describe. Needing
> two cracks at describing the problem is pretty much par for the course here.
>
> I haven't tested the query to see what's going on but if the problem is due to
> random() then in 8.4 you could use WITH to guarantee that the subquery is
> executed precisely once and the results reused as-is subsequently.
In that case, actually I need to get a random array of packages that's
different as much as possible for every account-id.
I'll try to create simpler example, with some script that would
generate data for you.
--
GJ