On 2021/11/16 18:55, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> I changed my mind; I’ll update the patch to ignore the error as
> before, because 1) as far as I know, there are no reports from the
> field concerning that we ignore all kinds of errors in cleaning up the
> prepared statements, so maybe we don’t need to change that, and 2) we
> already committed at least one of the remote transactions, so it’s not
> good to abort the local transaction unless we really have to.
Are you planning to update the patch? In addition to this change,
at least documentation about new parallel_commit parameter needs
to be included in the patch.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION