On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Sreejesh O S <
sreejeshos@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 3:13 PM, Dmitry Turin
> <
dmitry.turin@belarusbank.minsk.by> wrote:
>>
>> Hi, Pgsql-hackers.
>>
>> We would like to obtain your opinion on these two questions:
>>
>>
>> 1) We wanna append possibilities into Postgres engine, and wanna get top
>> estimation for
>> size of code, cost and time of implementation.
>> 1.1) We divide possibilities to elementary features, find analogues in
>> already written
>> code, and suppose e.g., that quantity of lines for 'create timer' will be
>> similar to
>> 'create function', and that implementation for 'create timer' is easy than
>> implementation
>> of 'create function' (because it already has prototype in 'create
>> function', and coping
>> source code is possiblle)
>> 1.2) We calculate cost and time by COCOMO
>>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cocomo >>
>> How relevant is this estimation ?
>>
>>
>> 2) We are captivated by price of Indians,
>> we listened much about low quality of code, written by Indians,
>
> How do you identify that the code written by Indians is low in quality ? Do
> you subcontracted to an Indian company or so ?
>>
>> we are fearing, that American company will resale implementation to Indian
>> subcontractor
>> (i.e. real developers will be Indians anyway).
>>
>>
>> What requirements should satisfy code, written by Indians, to be in next
>> version of Postgres ?
>>
>>
>>
>> Dmitry (SQL50, HTML60)
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (
pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
>> To make changes to your subscription:
>>
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers >
>