On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 7:35 AM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> Guido Barosio escribió:
>> Any update on this? Are we going for the country-pug or locale-pug convention?
>
> Did you guys decide whether you want to start PUGs in Mendoza or other
> places? The Argentina PUG should probably be named "arpug", but I wonder
> if the question is what are you going to name provincial PUGs.
>
> Note http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_3166-2:AR which says that the
> code for Mendoza is AR-M. IMHO "ar-m-pug" for Mendoza is a loser, as is
> m-arpug. How about mendoza-arpug instead?
That makes sense to me.
arpug can still exist on it's own.
For now, I'm grandfathering in the old group names.
Next message will be request for the 'arpug' mailing list.
-selena
--
Selena Deckelmann
Open Source Bridge - http://www.opensourcebridge.org
PDXPUG - http://pugs.postgresql.org/pdx
Me - http://www.chesnok.com/daily