Re: walreceiver fallback_application_name

--On 16. Januar 2011 21:53:47 +0100 Dimitri Fontaine 
<dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr> wrote:

>> Is "walreceiver" something that "the average DBA" is going to realize
>> what it is? Perhaps go for something like "replication slave"?
>
> I think walreceiver is very good here, and the user is already
> confronted to such phrasing.
>
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/interactive/runtime-config-wal.html#GU
> C-MAX-WAL-SENDERS

Hmm, given this link we have mentioned "standby" multiple times. Wouldn't 
it be better to follow that phrasing?

-- 
Thanks
Bernd