Re: User's responsibility when using a chain of "immutable" functions?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: User's responsibility when using a chain of "immutable" functions? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 2997974.1656484178@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: User's responsibility when using a chain of "immutable" functions? (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: User's responsibility when using a chain of "immutable" functions?
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes:
> st 29. 6. 2022 v 7:46 odesílatel Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> napsal:
>> ... that result has discouraged most people from spending much
>> time on mechanically checking such things. If you declare a function
>> immutable, Postgres will believe you; the consequences if you lied
>> are on your own head.
> We cannot ensure that the function is immutable, but we can detect that the
> function is not very probably immutable (in execution time).
Sure, there are a lot of easy cases where we could say "that's
obviously not immutable". But is it worth spending engineering
effort and runtime on that? I suspect the cases that people
might actually mess up are less obvious, so that we might
accomplish little more than offering a false sense of security.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: