Re: Perl 5.10 vs. PG 8.4 on Win32

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Perl 5.10 vs. PG 8.4 on Win32
Дата
Msg-id 2950.1242397419@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Perl 5.10 vs. PG 8.4 on Win32  (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>)
Ответы Re: Perl 5.10 vs. PG 8.4 on Win32
Список pgsql-bugs
Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> writes:
> CREATE LANGUAGE plperl; causes a backend crash on 8.4 with ActivePerl
> 5.10.0 (running on XP Pro). I'm testing this on beta 2 which I just
> rolled, however I believe this is probably the same issue that Kevin
> Field was reporting here:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/200904171407.n3HE7uri070869@wwwmaster.postgresql.org.
> For info, 0xC0000005 is a pretty general access violation error.

> I couldn't get much out of the server in the way of logs:

> 2009-05-15 11:40:29 BST DEBUG:  shmem_exit(-1)
> 2009-05-15 11:40:29 BST STATEMENT:  create language plperl;
> 2009-05-15 11:40:29 BST DEBUG:  proc_exit(-1)
> 2009-05-15 11:40:29 BST STATEMENT:  create language plperl;
> 2009-05-15 11:40:29 BST DEBUG:  reaping dead processes
> 2009-05-15 11:40:29 BST DEBUG:  server process (PID 3432) was
> terminated by exception 0xC0000005

Ho, that's pretty curious.  The first two messages are the trace of the
atexit hook I recently installed, which means something called exit()
or the moral equivalent thereof.  I wouldn't really expect that to
happen in a crash situation ... is Windows dumb enough to try to run
the atexit hooks of a crashed process?

> 2009-05-15 11:40:29 BST DEBUG:  sending SIGQUIT to process 2920
> 2009-05-15 11:40:29 BST DEBUG:  shmem_exit(-1)
> 2009-05-15 11:40:29 BST DEBUG:  proc_exit(-1)

... and this proves I broke something :-( ... quickdie() is deliberately
not supposed to run through the proc_exit stuff.  Will fix.  That's not
related to your Perl problem though.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Re: BUG #4796: Recovery followed by backup creates unrecoverable WAL-file
Следующее
От: Heikki Linnakangas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Re: BUG #4796: Recovery followed by backup creates unrecoverable WAL-file