Re: [HACKERS] PATCH for pgconnection.h

Vince Vielhaber <vev@michvhf.com> writes:
> On Thu, 8 Jul 1999, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think the proper solution is to add a configure-time test to see
>> whether a namespace declaration is needed.  We could use configure to
>> see whether we need ".h" on the end of C++ include file references, too.
>> (That's another thing that's going to be site-dependent for a while to
>> come.)

> Hmmm.  I'm running 2.7.2.1 here and in the case of <string> I have a
> file called: /usr/include/g++/string <-- note there's no .h on the end.
> Am I being dense here and missing something or does this differ from what
> other folks have?

Same as what I have, but I'm using gcc 2.7.2.2 so that's not real
surprising.  I was under the impression that naming conventions for
C++ library include files have changed at least once in the development
of the C++ standards --- but I may be mistaken.
        regards, tom lane