Re: Single-Transaction Utility options

Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On Fri, 2005-12-16 at 13:59 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Would -1 work, or just confuse people?

> That was my preference, I just thought it wouldn't be popular...
> So I'll happily change that.

OK.  While you're at it, I didn't like the long name either ;-).
We do not use the abbrevation txn anywhere, so I think it's bad to
introduce it here.  I'd vote for spelling out --single-transaction,
or maybe just --single.  I believe you can abbreviate long switch names
to any unique prefix, so there's not really any more typing here.

            regards, tom lane