Re: Single-Transaction Utility options

On Fri, 2005-12-16 at 15:56 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > On Fri, 2005-12-16 at 13:59 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Would -1 work, or just confuse people?
>
> > That was my preference, I just thought it wouldn't be popular...
> > So I'll happily change that.
>
> OK.  While you're at it, I didn't like the long name either ;-).
> We do not use the abbrevation txn anywhere, so I think it's bad to
> introduce it here.  I'd vote for spelling out --single-transaction,
> or maybe just --single.  I believe you can abbreviate long switch names
> to any unique prefix, so there's not really any more typing here.

Changes as discussed. "singletransaction.patch" attached.

options:
-1 or --single-transaction

Functions work as described.

Best Regards, Simon Riggs