John R Pierce <pierce@hogranch.com> writes:
> On 1/23/2013 8:32 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> FWIW, in Fedora-land I see: ...
> I'd be far more interested in what is in RHEL and CentOS. Fedora,
> with its 6 month obsolescence cycle, is of zero interest to me for
> deploying database servers.
But of course Fedora is also the upstream that will become RHEL7
and beyond.
> EL6 has libselinux 2.0.94
> EL5 has libselinux 1.33.4
sepgsql already requires libselinux 2.0.99, so it doesn't appear to me
that moving that goalpost is going to change things one way or the other
for the existing RHEL branches. I couldn't ship contrib/sepgsql today
in those branches.
It might be that the update timing makes a bigger difference in some
other distros, though. To return to Heikki's original point about
Debian, what are they shipping today?
regards, tom lane