Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Vivek Khera
Тема Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs
Дата
Msg-id 28EEAFE6-22FA-4CC3-81BC-45E14CD530CA@khera.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs  (Ron Peacetree <rjpeace@earthlink.net>)
Список pgsql-performance
On Apr 25, 2006, at 5:09 PM, Ron Peacetree wrote:

> ...and even if you do buy Intel, =DON"T= buy Dell unless you like
> causing trouble for yourself.
> Bad experiences with Dell in general and their poor PERC RAID
> controllers in specific are all over this and other DB forums.

I don't think that their current controllers suck like their older
ones did.  That's what you'll read about in the archives -- the old
stuff.  Eg, the 1850's embedded RAID controller really flies, but it
only works with the internal disks.  I can't comment on the external
array controller for the 1850, but I cannot imagine it being any slower.

And personally, I've not experienced any major problems aside from
two bad PE1550's 4 years ago.  And I have currently about 15 Dell
servers running 24x7x365 doing various tasks, including postgres.

However, my *big* databases always go on dual opteron boxes.  my
current favorite is the SunFire X4100 with an external RAID.


В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Vivek Khera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Firebird 1.5.3 X Postgresql 8.1.3 (linux Firebird 1.5.3 X Postgresql 8.1.3 (linux and and windows)]