Re: BUG #15080: ecpg on windows doesn't define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: BUG #15080: ecpg on windows doesn't define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT
Дата
Msg-id 28287.1526009787@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на RE: BUG #15080: ecpg on windows doesn't define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT  (Jonathan Allen <jallen@americansavingslife.com>)
Ответы RE: BUG #15080: ecpg on windows doesn't define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT  (Huong Dangminh <huo-dangminh@ys.jp.nec.com>)
Список pgsql-bugs
Дерево обсуждения 
Jonathan Allen <jallen@americansavingslife.com> writes:
> I saw the release of v10.4 today and was very excited to try using the official version of ecpg, but unfortunately
I'mgetting the same "unsupported type "long long" on line x" error.  SQL State: YE000, SQL Code: -200. 
> ...did this fix not make it into the May release?

Well, we committed *something* about that:

https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=fda3e65786763bd43abc576a23035a4cd24ed138

Does that not match the fix you were using?

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jonathan Allen
Дата:
Сообщение: RE: BUG #15080: ecpg on windows doesn't define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT
Следующее
От: PG Bug reporting form
Дата:
Сообщение: BUG #15193: Postgres Coredumped in AIX