Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Joe Conway writes:
>> I was thinking something similar. This exact question has come up at
>> least three times in the last three months. I doubt we'd want a special
>> keyword like CURRENT_QUERY, but maybe current_query()?
> The current statement can be examined using the statistics views and
> functions.
That's not very reliable though --- unless the current query has been
running for quite a few milliseconds, there's no guarantee it will be
reflected in the statistics collector's output.
regards, tom lane