Re: [GENERAL] capturing and storing query statement with

Joe Conway writes:

> I was thinking something similar. This exact question has come up at
> least three times in the last three months. I doubt we'd want a special
> keyword like CURRENT_QUERY, but maybe current_query()?

The current statement can be examined using the statistics views and
functions.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net