Re: [HACKERS] Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Josh Berkus
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication.
Дата
Msg-id 27393f4c-3a12-4055-8d18-436e340d7ea5@berkus.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication.  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication.  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 08/09/2017 10:49 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 8:19 AM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote:
>>> This item appears under "decisions to recheck mid-beta".  If anyone is going
>>> to push for a change here, now is the time.
>>
>> It has been 1 week since the previous mail. I though that there were
>> others argued to change the behavior of old-style setting so that a
>> quorum commit is chosen. If nobody is going to push for a change we
>> can live with the current behavior?
> 
> FWIW, I still see no harm in keeping backward-compatibility here, so I
> am in favor of a statu-quo.
> 

I am vaguely in favor of making quorum the default over "ordered".
However, given that anybody using sync commit without
understanding/customizing the setup is going to be sorry regardless,
keeping backwards compatibility is acceptable.

-- 
Josh Berkus
Containers & Databases Oh My!



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Remove 1MB size limit in tsvector
Следующее
От: Ants Aasma
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] emergency outage requiring database restart