Re: [HACKERS] Parallel regress tests (was Re: FOREIGN KEY andshift/reduce)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Parallel regress tests (was Re: FOREIGN KEY andshift/reduce)
Дата
Msg-id 27022.944668952@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Parallel regress tests (was Re: FOREIGN KEY andshift/reduce)  (Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Parallel regress tests (was Re: FOREIGN KEY andshift/reduce)  (wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck))
Re: [HACKERS] Parallel regress tests (was Re: FOREIGN KEY andshift/reduce)  (wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck))
Список pgsql-hackers
Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu> writes:
>> Kind of like a simple semaphore. Isn't that what you are getting at?

> LISTEN/NOTIFY might be useful for this...

LISTEN/NOTIFY would be one of the things we were trying to *test*.
It's not helpful for checking intra-transaction-block behavior anyway,
since notifys are only sent at commit and only heard between
transactions.

I like the tcl/expect idea a lot.  We'd have to upgrade our tcl
interface to support asynchronous queries (ie, send query then do other
stuff until answer arrives); AFAIR it can't handle that now.  But that'd
be well worth doing anyway...
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Thomas Lockhart
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Parallel regress tests (was Re: FOREIGN KEY andshift/reduce)
Следующее
От: Kyle Bateman
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Raising funds for PostgreSQL