Re: libpq compression

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: libpq compression
Дата
Msg-id 26825.1340206465@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: libpq compression  (Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org>)
Ответы Re: libpq compression  (Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org> writes:
> I wonder though if shouldn't restrict the allowed ciphers list to being
> a simple list of supported ciphers. If our goal is to support multiple
> SSL libraries transparently then surely having openssl-specific syntax
> in the config file isn't exactly great anyway...

No, we don't want to go there, because then we'd have to worry about
keeping the default list in sync with what's supported by the particular
version of the particular library we chance to be using.  That's about
as far from transparent as you can get.  A notation like "DEFAULT"
is really quite ideal for our purposes in that respect.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Pg default's verbosity?
Следующее
От: "Kevin Grittner"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH 10/16] Introduce the concept that wal has a 'origin' node