"Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> No, this is running with the patch that suppresses that. Basically, for
> some reason that I have been unable to find, and which leaves no log
> trace, copy just stops after about 4 or 5 lines, and then there are a
> bunch of consequent failures. I can't account for it yet. All I do know is
> that it happens when the tests are run with high parallelism and doesn't
> with no or low parallelism.
That seems *really weird*. When you say "stops after 4 or 5 lines",
do you mean that the first few rows of the source data get committed
successfully, but the rest don't?
regards, tom lane