Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> On ons, 2012-06-20 at 13:26 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> That might actually be a good idea. We can't really change the way we
>> named the betas, but it's not too late to consider naming the actual
>> release as 9.2.0...
> The final release was always going to be called 9.2.0, but naming the
> beta 9.2.0betaX is wrong. There was a previous discussion about that
> particular point.
Yes. There is no reason to change the naming scheme we have been using
for years now (at least since version_stamp.pl was invented for 7.4).
The only problem is that somebody got the name of the directory wrong on
the FTP server.
regards, tom lane