Re: Bad canonicalization for dateranges with 'infinity' bounds

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jeff Davis
Тема Re: Bad canonicalization for dateranges with 'infinity' bounds
Дата
Msg-id 263c516302e7afbd982b14f37629bc2601e15281.camel@j-davis.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Bad canonicalization for dateranges with 'infinity' bounds  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Bad canonicalization for dateranges with 'infinity' bounds  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 2019-07-18 at 17:36 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> The commit message claims this was back-patched, but I see no back-
> patch?

Sorry, I noticed an issue after pushing: we were passing a datum
directly to DATE_NOT_FINITE, when we should have called
DatumGetDateADT() first. I ran through the tests again and now pushed
to all branches.

> (The commit message doesn't seem to have made it to the pgsql-
> committers
> list either, but that's probably an independent issue.)

I was curious about that as well.

Regards,
    Jeff Davis





В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Ian Barwick
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Documentation fix for adding a column with a default value
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Bad canonicalization for dateranges with 'infinity' bounds