Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Meh. I think you're putting a bit too much faith in your ability to
>> predict the locus of bugs that you think aren't there.
> Well, I'm open to suggestions.
As a suggestion: it'd be worth explicitly testing zero-byte and one-byte
messages, those being obvious edge cases. Then, say, randomly chosen
lengths in the range 100-1000; this would help ferret out odd-length
issues. And something with message sizes larger than the queue size.
regards, tom lane