Re: PostgreSQL 9.0 or 9.1 ?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Nicholson, Brad (Toronto, ON, CA)
Тема Re: PostgreSQL 9.0 or 9.1 ?
Дата
Msg-id 2626AEE4839D064CB0472A3814DC403F46D79F9194@GVW1092EXB.americas.hpqcorp.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: PostgreSQL 9.0 or 9.1 ?  (Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: PostgreSQL 9.0 or 9.1 ?  (Achilleas Mantzios <achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com>)
Список pgsql-general
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-general-
> owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Grzegorz Jaskiewicz
> Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 11:05 AM
> To: Achilleas Mantzios
> Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL 9.0 or 9.1 ?
> 
> It could be worth considering 9.1. Probably by the time you get
> production ready version, 9.1 will be already stable (few months I
> guess).
> The usual answer to that question is - it will be ready when its ready.
> 

I would also ask, what is your (and your managements) tolerance for risk, and do you actually need any of the new
featuresand/or performance benefits in 9.1?
 

Postgres does have an excellent track record for quality and stability with new releases, but a couple of months in the
fieldisn't really considered stable in most places.
 

Brad.

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Vick Khera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PostgreSQL 9.0 or 9.1 ?
Следующее
От: Manuel Gysin
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Encryption For Specific Column- Where to store the key