Re: SELECT constant; takes 15x longer on 9.0?

"David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com> writes:
> On Apr 6, 2010, at 11:15 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Huh.  I'm still curious, because in my test the overhead of those
>> options seemed to be about 3x.  So there's still something considerably
>> different between what you did and what I did.

> Are you doing this on a Mac?

I hadn't, but since you mention it: 100000 iterations take about 7.5sec
with non-assert CVS HEAD and 15sec with asserts, on a 2008 Macbook Pro.
Color me still confused.
        regards, tom lane