Gavin Sherry <swm@linuxworld.com.au> writes:
> I'm thinking that temporary views should be pretty trivial to
> implement.
... except not so trivial, per the rest of your note.
Do we actually need any such feature? Views on temp tables already work
correctly in CVS tip: the implicit DROP CASCADE on temp tables at
backend exit makes such views go 'way too.
regards, tom lane