Re: Prepared Statements vs. pgbouncer

Oliver Jowett <oliver@opencloud.com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'm kinda hijacking the thread here, because this question is unrelated
>> to pgbouncer's behavior, but: have you ever done any performance
>> measurement to prove that preparing BEGIN/COMMIT/ROLLBACK is a good idea?

> No benchmarks. There would be essentially no difference in the driver
> code either way (literally, you'd have to add code to avoid preparing
> the statement) so unless named statements are much more expensive than
> unnamed ones it's probably not worth worrying about.

I don't have a reason to think it's a big loss --- I was just worried
that you were going out of your way to make this happen, when it's
probably not a win either.

            regards, tom lane