Re: [HACKERS] Hash Indexes

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jesper Pedersen
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Hash Indexes
Дата
Msg-id 25b3631c-ae24-dbdd-cbca-a3f8bd31eceb@redhat.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Hash Indexes  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 12/11/2016 11:37 PM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 2:02 AM, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> With above fixes, the test ran successfully for more than a day.
>>
> There was a small typo in the previous patch which is fixed in
> attached.  I don't think it will impact the test results if you have
> already started the test with the previous patch, but if not, then it
> is better to test with attached.
>

A mix work load (INSERT, DELETE and VACUUM primarily) is successful here 
too using _v2.

Thanks !

Best regards, Jesper




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [sqlsmith] FailedAssertion("!(XLogCtl->Insert.exclusiveBackup)",File: "xlog.c", Line: 10200)
Следующее
От: Ashutosh Bapat
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6